Preterism is heresy

by | Feb 12, 2024 | 4. Eschatology Bible Studies

Preterism Is Heresy

There are many who call themselves Christian but nevertheless maintain a preterist worldview. This is entirely incompatible with Christian orthodoxy. Preterists themselves recognized this truth in their history, which is why you have some who call themselves partial preterists. Full preterism actually denies bodily resurrection and the physical return of Christ to the earth. The latter may not seem like a big deal, but it is intimately connected to the former, which is an essential part of the Christian faith. Preterists believe that all of Revelation, and all eschatological matters were fulfilled in the past, with the events of 70 AD being the culmination of all the things discussed in the book of Revelation. To get there, they have to spiritualize the entire book, and thus things like the return of Christ and the resurrection of the dead are symbolic only.

 Partial preterism doesn’t make any sense at all, and again was developed as a way to get around the obvious heresy of full preterism. It teaches that most of Revelation was accomplished with the events of 70 AD, but that things like the resurrection are still to come. That’s convenient, but it faces the same problem as historians in that it claims to know which events fulfill which parts of Revelation while claiming others are yet to come. Pure speculation and opinion. The Bible clearly tells us NOT to have private opinions about Scripture, specifically prophecy. However, at least partial preterists and historists are not heretics.

READ MORE

I do not call preterists heretics because their belief is outside Christian orthodoxy. Any look at the ancient Christian creeds will tell you this. I do so because those creeds come from what the Apostles taught and wrote, and you can find it in the Bible!

Galatians 1:8-12 – But even if we, or an angel from heaven, PREACH ANY OTHER GOSPEL [euangelizō] to you than what we have preached to you, LET HIM BE ACCURSED. As we have said before, so now I say again, if anyone preaches any other gospel to you than what you have received, let him be accursed. For do I now persuade men or God? Or do I seek to please men? For if I still pleased men, I would not be a bondservant of Christ. But I make known to you, brethren, THAT THE GOSPEL [euangelizō] which was preached by me is not according to man. For I neither received it from man, nor was I taught it, but it came through the revelation of Jesus Christ.

It is very clear that if anyone preach a different gospel than the one committed to us by the Apostles, he is to be considered accursed, ANATHEMA! This is no light matter. The resurrection is a crucial part of the gospel message. It is what Paul preached everywhere he went. Look at this exchange with the philosophers in Athens.

Acts 17:18 – Then certain Epicurean and Stoic philosophers encountered him. And some said, “What does this babbler want to say?” Others said, “He seems to be a proclaimer of foreign gods,” because he preached [euangelizō] to them Jesus and the resurrection.

It was the preaching of the resurrection that set the people at Mars Hill off! This part of the Gospel is the most essential part! Paul makes that clear in 1 Corinthians 15.

 1 Corinthians 15:1-19 – Moreover, brethren, I DECLARE TO YOU THE GOSPEL [euangelion] WHICH I PREACHED [euangelizō] to you, which also you received and in which you stand, BY WHICH ALSO YOU ARE SAVED if you hold fast that word which I PREACHED [euangelizō] to you—UNLESS YOU BELEIVED IN VAIN. For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, and that He was seen by Cephas, then by the twelve. After that, He was seen by over five hundred brethren at once, of whom the greater part remain to the present, but some have fallen asleep. After that, He was seen by James, then by all the apostles. Then last of all, He was seen by me also, as by one born out of due time. For I am the least of the apostles, who am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. But by the grace of God, I am what I am, and His grace toward me was not in vain, but I labored more abundantly than they all, yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me. Therefore, whether it was I or they, so we preach and so you believed. Now IF CHRIST IS PREACHED THAT HE HAS BEEN RAISED FROM THE DEAD, HOW DO SOME AMONG YOU SAY THERE IS NO RESRRECTION OF THE DEAD? BUT IF THERE IS NO RESURRECTION OF THE DEAD, THEN CHRIST IS NOT RISEN. AND IF CHRIST IS NOT RISEN, THEN OUR PREACHING IS EMPTY AND YOUR FAITH IS ALSO EMPTY. Yes, and we are found false witnesses of God because we have testified of God that He raised up Christ, whom He did not raise up—if in fact the dead do not rise. For if the dead do not rise, then Christ is not risen. And if Christ is not risen, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins! Then also those who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men the most pitiable.

The Apostle Paul couldn’t make this any clearer: if you reject the resurrection of the dead, you are not a believer in Christ! In fact, you have made Christ and the Apostles LIARS. The Gospel demands a future resurrection of the dead. To allegorize this, to make it all symbolic, is to promote rank heresy. This is why I condemn preterists as heretics. It is not a pejorative line. It is an immutable, biblical fact.

The Early Church Fathers on Revelation

Church Fathers on Revelation   Irenaeus (AD 130 – 202) - Against Heresies written sometime between (AD 174 – 189) It is alleged by many preterists that Irenaeus, who lived between AD 130 and AD 202, is the earliest Church Father to attest that John the Apostle...

Why I do not debate Heretics

Why I do not debate heretics Preterists are heretics. This is beyond contestation. They deny the bodily resurrection of believers. I will not wish them well, neither will I engage in discussion with them about God’s word. I will condemn them and move on. If you think...

Timeline of Biblical History

Timeline of Biblical History 2000 Years = BC 3968 – BC 1968 2000 Years = BC 1968 – AD 33 2000 Years = AD 33 – AD 2033 Flood in Noah’s Time – Year 1656 from the Fall of Adam. This is 2312 BC. Birth of Abraham – Year 1948 from the Fall of Adam. This is 2020 BC. Abraham...

2 Thessalonians 2

2 Thessalonians 2 I would like to do a study of the text of 2 Thessalonians 2. I firmly believe that the Bible is NOT of private interpretation. Indeed, no text is. Authors mean what they say, and they say what they mean! How much more is this true of the Holy Spirit?...

Daniel 9-12

Daniel 9 This is a study on the prophecy of Daniel 9. Daniel 9 is one of the most contentious and argued passages in end-time eschatology. It alone lays the foundation for a belief in a final seven-year period that will bring in the end of this age, and the...

Daniel’s 70 weeks of years in history

Daniel 70 Weeks in History The 70th week of Daniel began in the first year of Cyrus. Of this, there can be no doubt, unless you throw away the Bible. Daniel was a contemporary of Cyrus, The Darius that figures in his story is likely Cyaxeres II, who was a contemporary...

John the Revelator

John the Revelator Is Revelation a prophecy about coming events, or are they events that have already occurred in history? For most of Christian history, they were thought to be events coming, whenever the end of the age actually arrived. Some argue that the book was...

The Righteous in White Linen

The Righteous in White Linen Revelation 19:5-9, 11-14 - Then a voice came from the throne, saying, “Praise our God, all you His servants and those who fear Him, both small and great!” And I heard, as it were, the voice of a great multitude, as the sound of many waters...

The Second Coming and the Rapture

  The Second Coming and the Rapture This is a study on the connection between the Second Coming of Christ and the Rapture. Let us start with the most controversial subject: the rapture. I honestly cannot understand why this is controversial as it is entirely...

Wrath vs. Wrath

Wrath vs. Wrath Matthew 3:7 – But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, “Brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath [ὀργή] to come? This certainly seems like it’s speaking about God’s eschatological wrath,...